
lol
Mask-wearing "the single most effective public health measure at tackling Covid, reducing incidence by 53%β https://t.co/sR0g1rbQHR
— Richard Sever (@cshperspectives) November 18, 2021
Well, if a meta-analysis of 6 studies that are totally incapable of estimating causal effects and found wildly heterogeneous results say that it's 53%, it has to be 53% and anyone who denies it hates science!
This is one of the 6 studies they used in the meta-analysis, and one of those for which they assessed the risk of bias as "moderate", as opposed to "critical". I just had a look at their model, and it doesn't even include covariates for mobility, lmao.
Confession: I do hate science and hating science is good actually, because this βοΈ is what most science is like π€·ββοΈ
Well, if a meta-analysis of 6 studies that are totally incapable of estimating causal effects and found wildly heterogeneous results say that it's 53%, it has to be 53% and anyone who denies it hates science!
— Philippe Lemoine (@phl43) November 18, 2021
What I love is that, after posting this ridiculous article and advertising this bullshit estimate, he still manages to castigate someone else for allegedly spreading disinformation on masks π
Meanwhile today in DC, another mask "expertβ speaksβ¦ π§΅ https://t.co/P2UoabrKhB
— Richard Sever (@cshperspectives) November 18, 2021
Follow us on Twitter
to be informed of the latest developments and updates!
Follow @tivitikothreadYou can easily use to @tivitikothread bot for create more readable thread!